Can We Trust Wikipedia As a Reliable Source?!

Wikipedia – that incredible invention that has Google-like qualities – our first port of call in our time of crisis. A true warrior for us all – it has been there for us through thick and thin. And yet, it is frowned upon by academics. If someone were to dare reference Wikipedia in an assignment, then they are effectively signing their own death warrant. But is it fair to adopt this approach, or does Wikipedia deserve more recognition from academics?

 

silver and black dell laptop beside white calla lily in clear glass vase on brown wooden desk
Wikipedia is one of the world’s most popular websites. Photo by Lisa Fotios on Pexels.com

 

Overview

Let’s start with a few basics. Wikipedia is an online encyclopaedia which allows its users to write articles. There are currently 5million articles on the UK version of Wikipedia. The beauty is, anyone can make an account and edit. Even better, the website doesn’t succumb to corporate greed and bombard the user with advertising (sorry from the UniEel team), instead relying on user donations to keep it alive. Wikipedia has an article on basically everything, and as was mentioned in the introduction – is a common first port of call in a moment of need.

 

Write_UE_X8_Banner

 

Tightly Patrolled

It is a bit of a myth that ‘any Tom, Dick or Harry’ can edit an article. Sure they can, but Wikipedia has a dedicated team of moderators that ensure each change to any article is checked over. Articles are supposed to follow a set code, including referencing. The vast, vast majority of articles have references on them. Therefore, what has been written has a foundation to it. While there is a threat of vandalism, a clever system is in place which allows the simple restoration of a previous, unvandalised version of the page. Besides, does anyone really have the time these days to vandalise a Wikipedia article – one would imagine there are slightly funner things to do…

 

Egypt
There have been some infamous Wikipedia hoaxes

 

Reliability

There are several good points to Wikipedia, as outlined above. Of course there are several famous hoaxes that have taken place, but by-and-large Wikipedia is a reliable source. Sure, it isn’t the Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship, but it is still a valuable source of information. The systems that are in place over at Wikipedia ensure that it is a pleasant environment for all. Wikipedia is a very underappreciated website – a life without Wikipedia is almost unimaginable.

 


READ MORE DEBATES:


 

Despite its good points, it seems as if it will be a long, long time before Wikipedia is considered an acceptable source for academic work. Sometimes, inertia takes over in these instances. The world is so set on the idea that Wikipedia isn’t a reliable source, that even though the site has improved hugely in recent times – no one will accept it. Hopefully, it will secure the recognition it deserves in the forthcoming years. Maybe one day it will earn the title of ‘reliable academic source’. One day…

 

Support

 

SEE ALL OF OUR WORLDEEL ARTICLES!

Remember to Follow us on Facebook and Twitter! Oh, and maybe even donate to Wikipedia.

Advertisements

One thought on “Can We Trust Wikipedia As a Reliable Source?!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.